Umgang mit Open-Access-Publikationsgebühren – die Situation in Deutschland in 2010
Umgang mit Open-Access-Publikationsgebühren – die Situation in Deutschland in 2010This article is a study on how to deal with Open Access costs in Germany in 2010.
This article is a study on how to deal with Open Access costs in Germany in 2010.
An article collecting aspects of open access concerning the costs of data rates and data storage space.
Hackday in London and Online: Sa., 7. Jul, 19:00 - So., 8. Jul, 02:00 MESZ.
See also Open Knowledge Pad to join in.
Graphics on the growth of open access repositories, based on OA data by The Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), operated by Bielefeld University Library.
The Directory of Open Access Journals is getting close to 8 thousand titles, and adding titles at a rate of over 3 per day. The Internet Archive provides access to 670,000 movies, 100,000 concerts, 1.3 million audio recordings, and 3.5 million texts.
If research film were streamed via online channels it would allow rapid feedback on research findings. It would also reach a much wider audience, compared with the current handful of readers of academic journals.
The Financial Times.
Email Q&A with Graham Taylor, Director of Educational, Academic and Professional Publishing at the UK-based Publishers Association on the Finch Report.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., announced today that its open access option for individual journal articles, OnlineOpen, will be available to authors in 81% of the journals it publishes. OnlineOpen gives authors the option to publish an open access paper in their journal of choice where it will benefit from maximum impact.
Press release by John Whiley & Sons.
“Science’s capacity for self-correction comes from its openness to scrutiny and challenge.”
Nature.
The Open Data research session will focus on the impact of Open Data research within the academic environment.
Submission Deadline 20th July 2012.
Press release by The Wellcome Trust on its new open access policy.
(see also article blow, The Guardian, June 29th.)
The scientific journal Nature argues that open access costs by analyzing the Royal Society Report and the Finch Report, both published recently (see posts June 19th and June 21st).
Two reports highlight key aspects of the global trend towards open access to research results: who will pay, and how much, to supply what to whom?
The U.K. Wellcome Trust enters a decisive strategy to promote and sustain their open access policies.
The Wellcome Trust plans to withhold a portion of grant money from scientists who do not make the results of their work freely available to the public, in a move that will embolden supporters of the growing open access movement in science. In addition, any research papers that are not freely available will not be counted as part of a scientist’s track record when Wellcome assesses any future applications for research funding.
The Guaridan.
U.K.: The JISC ( ‘Joint Information Systems Committee’) publishes the report Researchers of Tomorrow about the research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students.
“Researchers of Tomorrow” is the UK’s largest study to date on the research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students (born between 1982 and 1994). JISC and the British Library jointly commissioned the three year study in 2009, which involved 17,000 doctoral students from 70 universities at various stages in the project.
U.S. Congressman Mike Doyle (Democrat) writes an open letter to U.S. government urging the White House to support open access to federally funded research. He names successful strategies outside the U.S. and relates to the petition “Require free access over the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research”.
While we believe a continued commitment to research and development is an important component of investment in U.S. economic competitiveness, the added value of making research publicly available is that it can exponentially increase collaboration and intelligent knowledge sourcing among researchers. Public access policies can help to boost the value of academic works by exposing them to larger audiences and increasing the potential for citations.
The advent of Open Science paradigms leads to new interdependences between Research Funding and Open Science. On one hand Research Funders require projects to make more than just text publications available according to the Open Access principles, on the other hand it is to be discussed how Researching Funding itself could be more open (or reach the next level as Research Funding 2.0). This contribution focusses on the both aspects: How Research Funding is promoting Open Science and how an innovative and open Research Funding could look like.
The German Enquete-Commission “Internet and Digital Society” will press ahead with opening science.
Press release only in German.
Cathy Kennedy, OUP’s Senior Publisher for Journals says:
“Oxford University Press is delighted to support the Open Citation Corpus initiative in the interest of furthering and disseminating scholarship.”
Open access discussion in Denmark.
The Copenhagen Post.
New open science platform providing downloads of accompanying data and analysis/visualisation scripts of research material while reading a publication without having to ask the author.
Also, it should be possible to implement methods of data analysis and visualisation. An Open Science platform increases the transparency of research findings, facilitates reproduction of experiments and comprehension of the exact details of an experiment. It results in easier error correction and suggestion of more efficient ways of data analysis.
An announcement for the new World Bank’s open access policy: claiming to do open access due to the need to be more transparent, more open and to encourage the exchange of open ideas.
This is an article on how open access leads to higher quality in science and research listing these three arguments:
1) by counter-acting the publication bias in the current publication system,
2) by discouraging selective publishing on the part of the author,
3) by minimizing scientific fraud by the publication of underlying data.
John Naughton, The Observer, says that the Royal Society has overlooked the fact that for more open access, scientists should not only publish or make accessible data but also homemade software used by the scientists to get data needs to be published.
The Guardian / The Observer.
“Open Science - I welcome the Royal Society’s report” says Neelie Kroes, European Commission, responding to the (UK) Royal Society’s website about “Science as an Open Enterprise”.
Doing Science in the Open: Interview with Michael Nielsen given at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, published on youtube.com on June, 14th 2012.
BBC on Finch Report (see Finch Report post on June 19th 2012).
Follow discussion here.