Open Science interview with Martin Fenner is now online
wenn ich zwanzig Minuten brauche um irgendeinen Blog aufzusetzen und da meine ganze Wissenschaft publizieren kann dann ist das schon disruptiv
wenn ich zwanzig Minuten brauche um irgendeinen Blog aufzusetzen und da meine ganze Wissenschaft publizieren kann dann ist das schon disruptiv
Paul Royster is proud of what he has achieved with his institutional repository. Currently, it contains 73,000 full-text items, of which more than 60,000 are freely accessible to the world. This, says Royster, makes it the second largest institutional repository in the US, and it receives around 500,000 downloads per month, with around 30% of those going to international users. Unsurprisingly, Royster always assumed that he was in the vanguard of the OA movement, and that fellow OA advocates attached considerable value to the work he was doing. All this changed in 2012, when...Open and Shut?.
What do you think are the biggest challenges to the scientific community?
There are many aspects that currently make science an unattractive career to enter. We need urgently to make it more attractive to young people by enabling them to develop their own ideas, and that means giving them access to funding early in their career. The support of large groups should be tempered and more support given to individuals with great ideas and to those willing to tackle important and difficult ideas with uncertain outcomes.
In our ongoing quest to learn more about open access publishing, this week we’ve been chatting to Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Outreach Director for Faculty of 1000, about his belief in encouraging transparency, sharing and debate.
This is the second in our Series of Interviews with PeerJ Editors, giving them a voice to express their thoughts about academic publishing, open access and PeerJ. This time around we spoke to Fabiana Kubke who is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Medical Sciences (Department of Anatomy with Radiology) and a member of the Centre for Brain Research at the University of Auckland in New Zealand.
Ben Goldcare elucidates what’s wrong in the pharma industry.
The fixes are fairly simple, really. We need to make sure that all results from all clinical trials are always published, with no exceptions. What’s more, we need to go and dig up all the results from trials that were run in the past, because those are the trials that were done on the drugs that we are currently using.
The Economist (The Q&A).
“Imagine what would happen if all journalists who write about scholarship had access to primary sources themselves,” Suber says. “Imagine if they could put links to primary sources in their publications, and imagine if readers could click through for free online to those primary sources.”
Journalist’s Resource.
An interview with Peter Suber, director of the Harvard open access project on Radio Berkman.
See also same interview here.
Axel Rhamelow (Deutschlandradio) in an interview with Heinz Pampel, working in the coordination office of the Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren.
In German. Deutschlandradio.
Alejandro and I sat down for an interview with Seth Cooper, the Creative Director of the Center for Game Science at the University of Washington. Dr. Cooper spoke during TEDMED about the power of play and the role that games can play in dealing with scientific challenges.
Here is an interview with PLoS Founder Michael Eisen.
On whether pre-publication peer review should be abandoned?
“This I think we can and should more or less completely do away with — leaving only a very thin process for screening submitted articles to make sure they’re appropriate and real works of science.”
figshare allows researchers to publish all of their research outputs in seconds in an easily citable, sharable and discoverable manner.
Martin Fenner interviews figshare founder Mark Hahnel. The interview provides some background info on how figshare started, on the relaunch, and on how it works.